Omni 1:11-12 — LeGrand Baker — early Nephite apostasy

Omni 1:11-12 — LeGrand Baker — early Nephite apostasy

Omni 1:11-12
11   And behold, the record of this people is engraven upon plates which is had by the kings, according to the generations; and I know of no revelation save that which has been written, neither prophecy; wherefore, that which is sufficient is written. And I make an end.
12   Behold, I am Amaleki, the son of Abinadom. Behold, I will speak unto you somewhat concerning Mosiah, who was made king over the land of Zarahemla; for behold, he being warned of the Lord that he should flee out of the land of Nephi, and as many as would hearken unto the voice of the Lord should also depart out of the land with him, into the wilderness—

Theses verses may be telling a great deal by what they do not say. If one remembers who was writing, then what they write gives us an interesting look at the culture at the time. We learned earlier that there was a tribe of Nephi, another of Jacob, Sam, Laman, Lemuel, and so forth including each of the sons of Ishmael. According to the genealogy given, these authors were of the tribe of Jacob, but not just anyone in the tribe, with the leader of the tribe, the man who has the birthright in name, rank, and probably property. The Small Plates are probably the same to that family as the Brass Plates were to Laban and the House of Manassah. That is, they would be the family heritage, and the genealogical proof of the legitimacy of the owner’s claim to having the family birthright. We are told later that these later writers don’t write much because there aren’t any empty pages left in the book. However, it is safe to say there were some fine goldsmiths by then and the head of the Jacobite tribe could have hired someone to add pages if he wanted to, or if not, to create a second volume. Neither happened. What the writers of the book of Omni seem to be telling us is that the Nephite aristocracy still enjoyed the royal status; went to war when they had one to go to; believed in God, but in a religion which seems more structured than dynamic; but lack the insightfulness and the faithfulness of their forefathers. In this they have become just what one would expect they would.

Human history has shown that a dynamic cultural religion with the underpinnings of personal revelation is exceedingly fragile. Its fragility is that it is itself almost an oxymoron. The inclination of cultural (political, military, economic, organized religion ) leaders is to keep things at the status quo — that is to keep themselves in power with the minimal effort. Sometimes religious teachers unite with the leaders of the state church in order to secure the moral and sacral justification for their own positions of power. As time passes, there is less and less inclination on the part of the religious aristocracy to tolerate much free thinking. In that situation personal revelation becomes culturally acceptable if it is translated into testimony or dedicated behavior, but not if it espouses new ideas or even old ones which are not presently politically correct. There are lots of examples, early Christianity, early Moslem history, Puritanism in America. They all follow the same pattern. The Mormon Church has solved that problem by saying that anyone can and ought to have revelation for him/herself and to fulfill the calling one has in church. But it ends there. Legitimate personal revelation cannot be applied beyond, or be “higher” than one’s self, home, and calling in the church. This permits the dynamics of personal revelation, while at the same time keeping a tight lid on it, preventing that kind of usurpation.

Posted in Omni | Comments Off on Omni 1:11-12 — LeGrand Baker — early Nephite apostasy

Jarom 1:11, — LeGrand Baker — value of the Law of Moses

Jarom 1:11, — LeGrand Baker — value of the Law of Moses

11   Wherefore, the prophets, and the priests, and the teachers, did labor diligently, exhorting with all long-suffering the people to diligence; teaching the law of Moses, and the intent for which it was given; persuading them to look forward unto the Messiah, and believe in him to come as though he already was. And after this manner did they teach them (Jarom 1:11).

One of the biggest questions about the ancient Israelite religion is “What was the Law of Moses.” For Mormons, that question is expanded, because of verses like this one in Jarom to read, “How did the Law of Moses persuade one to look forward to the Messiah — the anointed one – the King.

Surprisingly, the Old Testament’s five books of Moses are not the best place to look for an adequate answer. We know from them the basic story of how the Law came to be, and what some of its criminal and social laws were, and we know a little about the sacrificial rites. But not much. The book of Leviticus is a how-to manual for the Levitical and Aaronic priesthood ordinances and sacrifices, but there is almost nothing there which tells what the king or the common people were doing during the great festivals. Neither is there very much that can be described as overtly “persuading them to look forward unto the Messiah.” There is the Passover lamb and ceremonial cleansing by blood, but they are not enough to justify Nephi’s statement, “Behold, my soul delighteth in proving unto my people the truth of the coming of Christ; for, for this end hath the law of Moses been given… ( 2 Nephi 11:4) Neither are they sufficient evidence for Jacob’s assurance that “And for this intent we keep the law of Moses, it pointing our souls to him; and for this cause it is sanctified unto us for righteousness…” (Jacob 4:5)

Historically, the problem is that the five books of Moses in our Old Testament were severely edited during the Jewish apostasy which followed the Babylonian captivity. (All one has to do is compare the Book of Moses in the Pearl of Great Price with the beginning of Genesis to see how severe an editing job someone did.) Consequently, much of the testimony about the Saviour which was in the Law, and almost all of the descriptions of the ancient temple rites and ordinances which were a part of the Law, have been edited out.

There are many examples: We don’t have a description of the temple ordinances associated with the great festivals, but we do have something which is very important. Many biblical scholars believe that the Psalms are the actual hymns and the dialog of the dramas performed during those festival temple rites. So if we wish to discover how the Law of Moses testified of Christ, the best place to look is not in the five books of Moses, but in the Psalms.

We do not know how many or which of the Psalms were written on the Brass Plates, but there are many phrases and short quotes lifted from the Psalms throughout the Book of Mormon, and Alma 12 quotes several verses of Psalm 95.

Since the Psalms were so important to the performances of the rites and dramas of the Law of Moses, it is reasonable to suppose that the Brass Plates contained all the Psalms which were a part of those rites and dramas. Whether we also have them all, one cannot say. Whether ours are in the same order, there is no question. They are not. The order was changed at about the same time, and probably by the same people who edited the books of Moses. So one can not read the Psalms in their present order to discover the sequence in which they were spoken anciently.

It is apparent from the Book of Mormon and the Psalms that the focus of the temple rites was the atoning sacrifice of the Messiah and the “way” provided for people to obtain the blessings of that atonement. They understood that the Law did not have the power to save, any more than does modern membership in the LDS church, without one’s personally availing oneself of all the blessings of the atonement. I think that is what King Benjamin meant when he observed, “…the law of Moses availeth nothing except it were through the atonement of his blood.” (Mosiah 3:15) King Benjamin did not say, “…the law of Moses availeth nothing!!!” He said, “…the law of Moses availeth nothing except it were through the atonement of his blood.” One could say the same thing about modern baptism into the Mormon church, and it would be equally true. But the Book of Mormon prophets also taught that “…the law of Moses… is a shadow of those things which are to come– ( Mosiah 16:14) The Saviour later reiterated that message when he said, “And as many as have received me, to them have I given to become the sons of God; and even so will I to as many as shall believe on my name, for behold, by me redemption cometh, and in me is the law of Moses fulfilled” (3 Nephi 9:17).

I would like to give just one example of the power by which the Law of Moses and its ancient temple rites and ordinances expressed the foreshadowed the Saviour’s sacrifice and taught the meaning of the atonement. But, as I suggested, my example will have to come from the Psalms. How this psalm was enacted in the dramas presented during the festival, I do not know. But it should have had a profound effect on those who participated in the ordinances and experienced the drama. The 22nd Psalm is spoken in first person. It represents the Saviour’s words as he hung on the cross. You will recognize some of those words because they are quoted by the Gospel writers who tell the story of the Saviour’s death. This first person account of his suffering and death continues from verse 1 through verse 21. Then the scene changes, and we go with the Saviour to the “great congregation” which awaits him in the spirit world.

I believe if one wishes to get a good look at how fully the Law of Moses, with its sacrifices, ordinances, temple rites and dramas, testified of the Saviour’s atonement, this Psalm is the first, if not the best place to look.

PSALM 22
1 My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring?
2 O my God, I cry in the daytime, but thou hearest not; and in the night season, and am not silent.
3 But thou art holy, O thou that inhabitest the praises of Israel.
4 Our fathers trusted in thee: they trusted, and thou didst deliver them.
5 They cried unto thee, and were delivered: they trusted in thee, and were not confounded.
6 But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people.
7 All they that see me laugh me to scorn: they shoot out the lip, they shake the head, saying,
8 He trusted on the LORD that he would deliver him: let him deliver him, seeing he delighted in him.
9 But thou art he that took me out of the womb: thou didst make me hope when I was upon my mother’s breasts.
10 I was cast upon thee from the womb: thou art my God from my mother’s belly.
11 Be not far from me; for trouble is near; for there is none to help.
12 Many bulls have compassed me: strong bulls of Bashan have beset me round.
13 They gaped upon me with their mouths, as a ravening and a roaring lion.
14 I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint: my heart is like wax; it is melted in the midst of my bowels.
15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws; and thou hast brought me into the dust of death.
16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.
17 I may tell all my bones: they look and stare upon me.
18 They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.
19 But be not thou far from me, O LORD: O my strength, haste thee to help me.
20 Deliver my soul from the sword; my darling from the power of the dog.
21 Save me from the lion’s mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns.

[The Saviour’s body is now dead, and his spirit goes to the “great congregation” which await him in the spirit world. The rest of this Psalm is a version of Joseph F. Smith’s vision of the redemption of the dead, D&C 138.]

22   I will declare thy name unto my brethren: in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee.
23   Ye that fear the LORD, praise him; all ye the seed of Jacob, glorify him; and fear him, all ye the seed of Israel
24   For he hath not despised nor abhorred the affliction of the afflicted; neither hath he hid his face from him; but when he cried unto him, he heard.
25   My praise shall be of thee in the great congregation: I will pay my vows before them that fear him.
26   The meek shall eat and be satisfied: they shall praise the LORD that seek him: your heart shall live for ever.
27   All the ends of the world shall remember and turn unto the LORD: and all the kindreds of the nations shall worship before thee.
28   For the kingdom is the LORD’s: and he is the governor among the nations.
29   All they that be fat upon earth shall eat and worship: all they that go down to the dust shall bow before him: and none can keep alive his own soul.
30   A seed shall serve him; it shall be accounted to the Lord for a generation.
31   They shall come, and shall declare his righteousness unto a people that shall be born, that he hath done this (Psalms 22:1-31)

Posted in Jarom | Comments Off on Jarom 1:11, — LeGrand Baker — value of the Law of Moses

Jacob 7:26-27 — LeGrand Baker — Jacob’s farewell

Jacob 7:26-27 — LeGrand Baker — Jacob’s farewell

Jacob 7:26-27
26   And it came to pass that I, Jacob, began to be old; and the record of this people being kept on the other plates of Nephi, wherefore, I conclude this record, declaring that I have written according to the best of my knowledge, by saying that the time passed away with us, and also our lives passed away like as it were unto us a dream, we being a lonesome and a solemn people, wanderers, cast out from Jerusalem, born in tribulation, in a wilderness, and hated of our brethren, which caused wars and contentions; wherefore, we did mourn out our days.
27   And I, Jacob, saw that I must soon go down to my grave; wherefore, I said unto my son Enos: Take these plates. And I told him the things which my brother Nephi had commanded me, and he promised obedience unto the commands. And I make an end of my writing upon these plates, which writing has been small; and to the reader I bid farewell, hoping that many of my brethren may read my words. Brethren, adieu (Jacob 7:26-27).

There are so many places in the Book of Mormon where age and maturity speak with wisdom and sophistication far beyond the years of the young Prophet Joseph when he translated it. These verses are an example:  “… the time passed away with us, and also our lives passed away like as it were unto us a dream,” When one has accumulated many years, he looks back to the days of his youth as though they were not quite real. The person who was then, no longer is. The world in which the boy and youth once roamed has disappeared. The adults who dominated his young existence no longer live. The ambitions, fears, hopes and frustrations he felt then, have been modified by time so they are matured into reality, or else they are no longer relevant. Thoreau once observed that as one grows older, one does not change, he only becomes more like himself. To the degree that is good and true, to that degree, one’s life has been a success. To the degree that one has violated the law of one’s own being, his life is a failure. I once heard an old man ask, Do you want to know what will happen to you on judgement day, I will tell you how. Close your eyes, move back in the time where your mind can find a little boy, yourself when you were about 8 years old. Reach out to that little boy and lift him up on your lap. Open your soul to him and let him look inside. Tell him who you are, what you have become, and how you came to be that way. Watch his face. Does he like you. Have you personified his sense of what is good and right. If that innocent little boy smiles, and embraces you as a friend, then you will know this: on judgement day, God will do the same, and you may count your life a success.

Jacob’s life is that way. The things which are obscured as in a distant dream are only the unhappy things.

… we being a lonesome and a solemn people, wanderers, cast out from Jerusalem, born in tribulation, in a wilderness, and hated of our brethren, which caused wars and contentions; wherefore, we did mourn out our days.

But for Jacob, there is a reality which is neither negated nor diluted by his old age or pending death:

I make an end of my writing upon these plates, which writing has been small; and to the reader I bid farewell, hoping that many of my brethren may read my words. Brethren, adieu.

The sorrows and frustrations of his life, as a dream, may pass away, but his testimony remains indelible, unaffected by either space or time.

Posted in Jacob | Comments Off on Jacob 7:26-27 — LeGrand Baker — Jacob’s farewell

Jacob 7:20-23 — LeGrand Baker — Sherem

Jacob 7:20-23 — LeGrand Baker — Sherem

Jacob 7:20-23
20   And it came to pass that when he [Sherem] had said these words he could say no more, and he gave up the ghost.
21   And when the multitude had witnessed that he spake these things as he was about to give up the ghost, they were astonished exceedingly; insomuch that the power of God came down upon them, and they were overcome that they fell to the earth.
22   Now, this thing was pleasing unto me, Jacob, for I had requested it of my Father who was in heaven; for he had heard my cry and answered my prayer.
23   And it came to pass that peace and the love of God was restored again among the people; and they searched the scriptures, and hearkened no more to the words of this wicked man.

This is a strange story. From the reading it appears that Sherem died because Jacob prayed for him to die. Such a story is difficult to understand for two reasons. First, because we tend to think of death as a kind of termination, even though our testimonies are sufficient to teach us that death is a kind of birth, and that Sherem’s death did not terminate his existence, it only restricted his influence. Second, as we look back in history we see lots of people whom we suppose would have caused a lot less trouble if they had just managed to die a little sooner than they did. Hitler and Stalin who were responsible for millions of deaths, are easy examples. It sounds like a cop-out to say “Well, we just don’t know the will of God.” People always say that when they have nothing more intelligent to say. Yet, that is very probably the correct answer.

President Benson frequently wrote and said (I personally heard him say it at least twice) that freedom is lost by bloodshed, and so, can only be regained by bloodshed. If evil social and political powers are to be rendered impotent, people must use force to put things right. Force against force equals war. In the early 19th century one would have felt justified in putting Napoleon in that list with Hitler and Stalin. Napoleon, like Hitler, conquered Europe then was defeated by the Russian winter. But nowadays Napoleon is so far away in time that we forget his megalomania and remember that he broke down many of the medieval walls of Europe, established a uniform Napoleonic code, and laid the foundation for what is now an increasingly probable united Europe. Hitler is called the “world’s greatest Zionist” by those who believe his persecution of the Jews was the most important factor in the world’s Jewish leaders’ deciding to support the state of Israel. Stalin created the greatest empire in the history of the world.

That empire spread over almost all of the world where LDS missionaries could not then go. In a little over half a century that empire imposed a Communist hope which could not be fulfilled, destroyed the “traditions of the fathers” which precluded the missionaries, then the empire collapsed. Now the missionaries can go almost everywhere, walking over the ashes of tradition which Communism left behind. It seems to me that the scriptures which talk about evil men destroying evil men may be applicable here (admitting many died who were not evil, but also admitting that death does not end life or progression, and probably does not even entirely terminate one’s interactive experience here.) One also remembers the Saviour’s statement that evil things must happen but wo to him by whom they happen. When one reads the prophecies, it is apparent that the plans and decisions of the Council in Heaven included wars and other catastrophes which would alter, and ultimately reorganize human society so the Gospel could be preached to every individual, and so the Saviour could ultimately reign here in peace. So it is not possible to say with certainty that Napoleon, Hitler, and Stalin acted contrary to the predictions of the Council.

Another example is James J. Strang, a relatively new convert in Nauvoo, who forged a paper from Joseph Smith which appointed Strang to be the new prophet. A number of people in Nauvoo followed him. Apostle Orson Hyde was in Nauvoo, trying to keep Strang from playing havoc with the saints there. On April 5, 1846, he wrote in a letter which was published in the Millennial Star on May 15, 1848, p. 156-158. In the letter Hyde quoted a revelation which he received regarding Strang and his followers. It reads,

In my meditation, this morning, the Spirit of the Lord came upon me, and I was moved to write: and being grieved in my spirit on account of false pretenses by evil designing persons to gain power, and lead away this flock of God; It whispered to me and said:
Evil men, ambitious of power, must needs arise among you, and they shall be led by their own self-will and not by me. Yet they are instruments in my hands, and are peermitted to try my people, and to collect from among them those who are not the elect, and such as are unworthy of eternal life. Grieve not after them, neither mourn nor be alarmed. My people know my voice and also the voice of my spirit, and a stranger they will not follow; therefore such as follow strangers are not my people. Behold James J. Strang hath cursed my people by his own spirit and not by mine.

The revelation then goes on to say the Church is in good hands, and the Twelve will direct it properly.

The situation in Nauvoo was different from the situation in the Nephite colony at the time of Jacob. In 1844, as the church was in transition and moving west, it needed a good pruning. But in Jacob’s time, the colony was too young to prune, so other steps had to be taken.

So that brings us back to the question, why will the Lord move Sherem out of the way, at the prayer of Jacob, and not answer the prayers of millions of people who wanted Hitler dead so WW II would end. If there is an answer, and I believe there is, that answer is probably this. The Lord could turn the horrors of WW II to his own ends, but Sherem’s program would have defeated the will and frustrated the decisions of the Council. It is easy to see how. The Nephite colony was very young. If Sherem had succeeded in destroying the worship of Christ from among that small group of people, all of their descendants would have had no more chance to know the truth than did the children of the Lamanites. In other words, Sherem and his program threatened the whole Christian history told in the Book of Mormon. If he had succeeded the history told in that book would not have happened, the testimonies would not have happened, nor would they have been written, and you and I , and the whole modern world, would not have the Book of Mormon as a part of the restored gospel. Sherem was challenging much more than just Jacob, he was threatening to negate the promises which the Lord had made to Jacob, Joseph of Egypt, Lehi, Nephi, and other prophets that the Nephites would be a righteous people. So Sherem had to be removed from exercising influence which could mess up the entire plan.

There is a similar story in early LDS church history. After the Saints had been driven from Missouri and had settled in Nauvoo, Thomas Reynolds, governor of Missouri, made it his personal mission in life to destroy the Prophet Joseph. When someone shot at ex-governor Boggs, Reynolds sent to Illinois Gov. Ford demanding the extradition of Joseph and Porter Rockwell for the attempted murder. Ford cooperated but Joseph escaped through a writ of habeas corpus which he secured in Nauvoo. Now in the spring of 1844, Reynolds was trying again. This time he had been assured of the cooperation of Thomas Sharp at Warsaw, and Robert F. Smith and his Anti-Mormon Central Committee of Correspondence. The Anti-Mormons had promised that if Missourians came to Illinois to arrest the Prophet again, they would give them their full support.

During their September, 1843, meeting, the Anti-Mormons had resolved that the president should contact Governor Reynolds to work out plans for another extradition attempt against the Prophet. Then, during their February, 1844, convention the Anti-Mormons officially resolved that they would give Reynold’s next extradition attempt their full support when it was attempted. (The Anti-Mormons were a political organization of Hancock county. Robert F. Smith was the chairman of their executive committee, called the Central Committee of Correspondence. He was also the justice of the peace who sent Joseph to Carthage jail, and also the captain of the Carthage Greys who were “guarding” the jail when the mob from Warsaw [probably led by Sharp] attacked the jail and killed Joseph and Hyrum) So Governor Reynolds had sufficient allies in Illinois to be assured that this time he could take the Prophet prisoner and whisk him off to Missouri. Apparently the plans between Reynolds and Robert F. Smith were already made.

Consider how that would have disrupted everything. In the spring of 1844, Joseph’s mission here was reaching a climax and he was making the final preparations for his own death – restoring the temple endowment to the twelve, giving them instructions about not only the endowment but also about the organization of the Kingdom of God, making initial plans to go west, and giving all of the priesthood keys and instructions of the government of church and the kingdom to the Twelve. If Reynolds had kidnaped Joseph at that juncture in church history, if Joseph had been imprisoned so he could not do all those things, or if he had been prematurely killed, it would have prevented Joseph from doing the things which he had been ordained to do in the Council. Reynolds was defying the Council decisions in the same way Sherem had. And with the same results.

At this juncture, something unexpected happened. While Governor Reynolds was alone in his office he put a rifle barrel in his mouth and blew out his own brains. In Warsaw, Sharp was mortified. He reported in the Signal,

“Death of Gov. Reynolds. Our city is overshadowed with gloom and distress! Governor Reynolds is no more! He has perished by his own hand!”  (Warsaw Signal, Warsaw, Illinois, 28 Feb. 1844.)

Reynolds death meant that whatever plans had been made between himself and Robert F. Smith’s committee would not come to fruition.

When the Prophet Joseph heard of the suicide he said,

I asked a short time since for the Lord to deliver me out of the hands of the Governor of Missouri, and if it needs must be to accomplish it, to take him away; and the next news that came pouring down from there was, that Governor Reynolds had shot himself. And I would now say, Beware, O earth, how you fight against the Saints of God and shed innocent blood; for in the days of Elijah, his enemies came upon him, and fire was called down from heaven and destroyed them.  (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.340)

In another place he said, “We asked the Lord to deliver us from Governor Reynolds, of Missouri; and he shot himself, and has gone to hell.” (DHC 6: 325) ”

The account of the prayer to which Joseph referred, and of its results, is given in some detail by Wilford Woodruff as follows,

I have heard the prophet Joseph pray when the power of God rested upon him, and all who heard him felt it; and I have seen his prayers answered in a marvelous manner almost immediately. Governor Reynolds on one occasion employed men to try and kidnap Joseph, and they almost accomplished their designs, but Joseph and some Gentile friends, as well as his brethren, through whom he was rescued, and was taken to Nauvoo and released under a writ of habeas corpus. But the governor continued to harass him with writs, and was determined to destroy Joseph. Joseph and the Twelve went before God in prayer, Joseph kneeling before the Lord, offered up prayer, and asked God to deliver him from the power of that man. Among other things he told the Lord that he was innocent before Him, and that his heart was heavy under the persecutions he endured. In about fortyeight hours from that time word reached Joseph that Reynolds had blown his brains out. Before perpetrating the deed he left a note on his desk stating, that as his services were not appreciated by the people of the state, he took that course to end his days.  (Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, p.33, 34; JD 24:55, January 27, 1883.)

So, in the case of Sherem and of Governor Reynolds, and I suppose anyone else who pushes it, if one pits his own will and actions against the purposes of the Council, it is that person, not the decisions of the Council, that will be frustrated.

Given the description of Joseph’s prayer, I believed he prayed with the Twelve as he was directed by the Spirit, so it was the Lord’s decision that Joseph should pray for release. There is no such description of Jacob’s prayer in the Book of Mormon, but I don’t believe Jacob would have offered that prayer unless the Spirit directed him to do so. If what I believe is true, then the story of Sherem dying because Jacob had prayed for it, is not such an extraordinary story after all. Prophets are prophets because they love and obey the Lord, their prayers are effectual because they pray in righteousness according to the directions of the Spirit.

Posted in Jacob | Comments Off on Jacob 7:20-23 — LeGrand Baker — Sherem

Jacob 7:11 — LeGrand Baker — true and false prophets

Jacob 7:11 — LeGrand Baker — true and false prophets

Jacob 7:11
11   Behold, I say unto you that none of the prophets have written, nor prophesied, save they have spoken concerning this Christ.

Every true prophet has testified of Christ. That is not only an overwhelming testimony of the Saviour, it is also the litmus test by which one can judge the validity of the prophet. Not only will a true prophet speak of Christ, and correctly teach his atonement, but he will also speak of him in the context of eternal covenants which we have/do/will make with him. It is amply proven in human history that false prophets, false teachers, and false kings can speak of Christ. But they are easily identifiable as false, though usually not by the people who live within the power of their political and cultural influence. They can be judged by their definition of the attributes of Christ’s person and personality, and even more easily by their understanding of the ordinances and covenants.

The Saviour’s own criteria for how to judge a true prophet is most apt here. The following is a long quote, one which you are already familiar with, but which is usually broken into segments so that the meaning which one would find in its continuity is lost in the pieces.

13   Enter ye in at the strait gate; for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, which leadeth to destruction, and many there be who go in thereat;
14   Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it (3 Nephi 14:13-23).

Jacob’s words make it clear what the “gate” is. He said:

41   O then, my beloved brethren, come unto the Lord, the Holy One. Remember that his paths are righteous. Behold, the way for man is narrow, but it lieth in a straight course before him, and the keeper of the gate is the Holy One of Israel; and he employeth no servant there; and there is none other way save it be by the gate; for he cannot be deceived, for the Lord God is his name.
42   And whoso knocketh, to him will he open; and the wise, and the learned, and they that are rich, who are puffed up because of their learning, and their wisdom, and their riches—yea, they are they whom he despiseth; and save they shall cast these things away, and consider themselves fools before God, and come down in the depths of humility, he will not open unto them (2 Nephi 9:41-42).

15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore, by their fruits ye shall know them (3 Nephi 14:13-23).

I suspect the only fruit which is relevant here is the fruit of the tree of life. If they do not have it, they cannot give it to others.

21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father who is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name, and in thy name have cast out devils, and in thy name done many wonderful works?

There are two sorts of people to whom that applies equally: The first is those who claim a false priesthood and seek to use it as though it were true. The second is those who have a true priesthood and use it falsely or for self-aggrandizing purposes.

23 And then will I profess unto them: I never knew you; depart from me, ye that work iniquity (3 Nephi 14:13-23).

Posted in Jacob | Comments Off on Jacob 7:11 — LeGrand Baker — true and false prophets

Jacob 7:7 — LeGrand Baker — the authority of a prophet

Jacob 7:7 — LeGrand Baker — the authority of a prophet

Jacob 7:7
7   And now behold, I, Sherem, declare unto you that this is blasphemy; for no man knoweth of such things; for he cannot tell of things tocome. And after this manner did Sherem contend against me.

I never read this passage without it recalling an experience I had when I was in 10th grade. The previous summer I had been reading some of Orson Pratt’s writings, and had looked forward to my first experience in seminary, because I wanted to talk about Elder Pratt’s ideas with someone and I expected my seminary teacher would be a that someone. One day, a couple weeks after school began, when I had been making comments in class and asking questions afterward, my seminary teacher said to me, “LeGrand, I can’t understand Orson Pratt, THEREFORE you cannot understand Orson Pratt. So stop reading that stuff and read something written for people your own age.”

I remember the situation, partly because of my disappointment, but more because of my shock at the utter absurdity of his argument: “I can’t understand Orson Pratt, THEREFORE you cannot understand Orson Pratt.” That amazed me. I thought Orson Pratt had the most brilliant mind I had ever discovered and was grateful that he could address himself to someone my age. (Now, as an old man, I have a photo of Orson Pratt hanging on the wall of my study. I look at and I still marvel at the intellect of that great man.) As a boy, I thought that my teacher had just used what must be the lowest form of logical reasoning. Since then, I have found that same reasoning is often used by people who admire themselves for their own remarkable intellect. Sherem is using it here. He argues, “I do not know the future THEREFORE you cannot know the future. ”

The scriptures testify that his logic is fallacious, and his collusion is false. There is a way one can not only know the future, but also the past—and the present as well. The medium through which that happens is the Holy Ghost, and there is a specific gift of the Holy Ghost which is called the “spirit of prophecy.” One must have the spirit of prophecy to know the truth of the past, as Alma explains,

47   And moreover, I say unto you that it has thus been revealed unto me, that the words which have been spoken by our fathers are true, even so according to the spirit of prophecy which is in me, which is also by the manifestation of the spirit of God (Alma 5:47).

John Taylor further explained,

In reality, this act of the atonement was the fulfillment of the sacrifices, of the prophesying, of the Passover, and of all the leading, prominent acts of the patriarchs and prophets relating thereto; and having performed this, the past and the future both centered in him. Did these worthies offer sacrifices? They prefigured his appearing, and atonement. Did they prophecy? It was of him, for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. Did they keep the Passover? He himself was the great expiatory offering. Were the people called upon afterwards to commemorate this event? They did it in remembrance of him, as a great memorial among all of his disciples in all nations, throughout all time; of the sacrifice of his broken body and spilt blood; the antitype of the sacrificial lamb slain at the time of the Passover; of him; as being the Mediator, the Messiah, the Christ, the Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End: the Son of the living God.
These scriptures evidently show that the testimony of Jesus was the very principle, essence, and power of the spirit of prophecy whereby the ancient prophets were inspired.(John Taylor, The Gospel Kingdom, 115-16, 120)

The Prophet Joseph placed himself in that same category of “prophet” as the ancient prophets, and explained why he had a valid claim to such a title.

If any person should ask me if I were a prophet, I should not deny it, as that would give me the lie; for, according to John, the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy; therefore, if I profess to be a witness or teacher, and have not the spirit of prophecy, which is the testimony of Jesus, I must be a false witness; but if I be a true teacher and witness, I must possess the spirit of prophecy, and that constitutes a prophet; and any man who says he is a teacher or a preacher of righteousness, and denies the spirit of prophecy, is a liar, and the truth is not in him; and by this key false teachers and impostors may be detected.  (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 269 and DHC 5:215-16)

To the question, “Do you [the Mormons] believe Joseph Smith, Jun., to be a Prophet?” Joseph responded,

Yes, and every other man who has the testimony of Jesus. For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” Then he quoted Revelation 19:10, which reads, “And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See that thou do it not; I am thy fellow servant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus; worship God; for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. ” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 119.)

The Prophet Joseph’s statement that “every other man who has the testimony of Jesus” is a prophet, is not only consistent with the teachings of the scriptures, it is the key to happiness in this world and to eternal life in the world to come. What follows are the statements of Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, Wilford Woodruff, Lorenzo Snow, and Joseph F. Smith which say Latter-day Saints not only have the right to be prophets in their own lives — in the conduct of their daily affairs, but, indeed, they must be. In these statements the men whom we revere as prophets indicate that an important purpose of the spirit of prophecy is to teach us how to live in the present. Two statements by the Prophet Joseph explain why that is so.

Faith comes by hearing the word of God, through the testimony of the servants of God; that testimony is always attended by the spirit of prophecy and revelation. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 148)

Salvation cannot come without revelation; it is in vain for anyone to minister without it.

No man is a minister of Jesus Christ without being a Prophet. No man can be a minister of Jesus Christ except he has the testimony of Jesus; and this is the spirit of prophecy. Whenever salvation has been administered, it has been by testimony.  (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.160)

But the Lord has so ordained that no man shall receive the benefits of the everlasting Priesthood without humbling himself before him, and giving him the glory for teaching him, that he may be able to witness to every man of the truth, and not depend upon the words of any individual on the earth, but know for himself, live by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God, love the Lord Jesus Christ and the institutions of his Kingdom, and finally enter into his glory. Every man and woman may be a revelator, and have the testimony of Jesus, which is the spirit of prophecy, and foresee the mind and will of God concerning them, eschew evil, and choose that which is good.  (Discourses of Brigham Young, 131 — JD 2:189)

…the whole Church and kingdom of God, men and women, should have, each for himself and herself, the testimony of Jesus Christ which is the spirit of prophecy. This should be in the possession of every man and woman in the Church, for their own government and guidance, and this has always been the teaching to us of President Brigham Young. And this is backed up by the revelations which the Lord has given in these last days, as you will find if you read the twentysecond section of the book of Doctrine and Covenants.  (Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, 58-59 — JD 18:125126 )

It is the privilege of every man and woman in this kingdom to enjoy the spirit of prophecy, which is the spirit of God; and to the faithful it reveals such things as are necessary for their comfort and consolation, and to guide them in their daily duties.  (Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, 61 — JD 9:324)

He [Brigham Young] is a prophet, I am a prophet, you are, and anybody is a prophet who has the testimony of Jesus Christ, for that is the spirit of prophecy. The elders of Israel are prophets. A prophet is not so great as an apostle. Christ has set in his Church, first, apostles; they hold the keys of the kingdom of God.  (Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, 90 — JD 13:165)

Men must administer salvation to continue in the priesthood. Men who wish to retain their standing before God in the holy priesthood must have the spirit of prophecy, and be qualified to administer life and salvation to the people; and if they cannot do it to the world, they must do it at home, in their families, in their shops, and in the streets, that their hearts may be inspired with words of life at their firesides, in teaching the gospel to their children and to their neighbors.(Teachings of Lorenzo Snow, 7576 — JD 4:157)

Joseph Smith is accused of being a false prophet. It is, however, beyond the power of the world to prove that he was a false prophet. They may so charge him, but you who have received the testimony of Jesus Christ, by the spirit of prophecy, through his administrations, are my witnesses that they have not the power to prove him false, and that is why they are so vexed about it.  (Joseph F. Smith, Gospel Doctrine, 485 — JD 24: 816)

Not only, as President Woodruff and the others said, is it the privilege of every man and woman in this kingdom to enjoy the spirit of prophecy, it is, as the Prophet Joseph taught, necessary to one’s salvation. Josephsaid,

No wonder Paul had to arise and be baptized and wash away his sins: No wonder the angel told good old Cornelius that he must send for Peter to learn how to be saved: Peter could baptize, and angels could not, so long as there were legal officers in the flesh holding the keys of the kingdom, or the authority of the priesthood. There is one evidence still further on this point, and that is that Jesus himself when he appeared to Paul on his way to Damascus, did not inform him how he could be saved. He had set in the church first Apostles, and secondly prophets, for the work of the ministry, perfecting of the saints, etc.; and as the grand rule of heaven was that nothing should ever be done on earth without revealing the secret to his servants the prophets, agreeably to Amos 3:7, so Paul could not learn so much from the Lord relative to his duty in the common salvation of man, as he could from one of Christ’s ambassadors called with the same heavenly calling of the lord, and endowed with the same power from on high-so that what they loosed on earth, should be loosed in heaven; and what they bound on earth should be bound in heaven: He, the Lord being a priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek, and the anointed Son of God, from before the foundation of the world, and they be begotten sons of Jesus though the gospel, to teach all nations-and lo I am with you always to the end of the world-that is-by the other comforter which the world cannot receive-for ye are the witnesses-having the testimony of Jesus which is the spirit of prophecy.(Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 264)

Posted in Jacob | Comments Off on Jacob 7:7 — LeGrand Baker — the authority of a prophet